A quality score tells you which affiliates send good traffic. Qualification rules determine what happens to traffic that does not meet your standards. Without rules, scoring is just reporting. With rules, your platform automatically holds, adjusts, or rejects payouts based on predefined quality criteria -- removing the need for manual review of every conversion.
Qualification rules sit between the conversion event and the commission payout. When a referred user completes an action (registration, deposit, trade, purchase), the system evaluates whether that action meets the qualification criteria before marking it as commissionable. This is the single most effective mechanism for controlling traffic quality at scale.
Types of Qualification Rules
Rule Type
What It Checks
Example Configuration
Minimum deposit
First deposit meets a dollar threshold
FTD >= $20 to qualify as CPA conversion
Activity requirement
User performs meaningful post-registration action
Must place at least 1 trade or 1 bet within 7 days of deposit
IP country must match a permitted jurisdiction list
Device uniqueness
Conversion comes from a unique device
Device fingerprint not seen in another conversion within 30 days
KYC completion
User passes identity verification
KYC documents submitted and approved within 14 days of registration
Negative revenue filter
User does not generate negative value
Net revenue >= $0 at day-30 review for RevShare qualification
Duplicate detection
User is not already in the system
Email, phone, or payment method not linked to an existing account
Layer qualification rules from broad to specific. Start with technical filters (bot detection, geo-match, duplicate check), then apply behavioral requirements (minimum deposit, activity within timeframe), then financial thresholds (net revenue positive at review date). Each layer reduces the volume that needs manual review at the next stage.
Configuring Rules Without Losing Good Partners
The risk of aggressive qualification rules is rejecting legitimate conversions. A new player who deposits $15 instead of $20 is not fraudulent -- they are cautious. Setting the minimum deposit threshold too high filters out real users along with low-quality ones. The goal is to find thresholds that catch 80% of quality problems while rejecting less than 5% of legitimate conversions.
Analyze your conversion data before setting thresholds: what is the 25th percentile deposit amount for users who remain active at day 30?
Run qualification rules in "shadow mode" for 30 days before enforcing -- measure what would have been rejected and review those cases manually
Set different thresholds by partner tier: premium partners with proven track records can have lighter qualification requirements
Build in an appeal process: when a conversion is disqualified, the affiliate should be able to see the reason and request manual review
Review and adjust thresholds quarterly based on evolving traffic patterns and conversion data
Automated Enforcement Workflows
Manual qualification review does not scale. A program processing 5,000 conversions per month cannot have a human evaluating each one. Automated enforcement applies rules instantly at the platform level, with manual review reserved for edge cases and appeals. The workflow follows a clear path: conversion event fires, qualification rules evaluate, and the conversion is either approved, held for review, or rejected.
Qualification Outcome
System Action
Partner Visibility
Approved
Commission calculated and added to next payout cycle
Conversion shows as "qualified" in partner dashboard
Held for review
Commission pending, flagged for manual evaluation
Conversion shows as "pending review" with estimated review timeline
Rejected (rule-based)
No commission, conversion marked as disqualified
Conversion shows rejection reason -- partner can appeal within 14 days
Rejected (fraud)
No commission, account flagged for fraud team review
Conversion removed from dashboard, partner notified of investigation
Never reject conversions silently. Partners who see conversions disappear without explanation will assume the program is cheating them and leave. Transparent rejection with clear reasons builds trust even when the partner disagrees with the outcome. The appeal process is not just fair -- it is a retention mechanism for affiliates.
Qualification Rules by Commission Model
CPA programs need front-loaded qualification rules because the commission is paid once at conversion. If a low-quality registration triggers a $150 CPA and the user never returns, that cost is unrecoverable. RevShare programs can afford lighter upfront qualification because the commission is tied to ongoing activity -- a user who generates no revenue generates no commission. Hybrid models need qualification at both the CPA trigger point and at RevShare review intervals.