Before you migrate any affiliate program, you need a stack map. This is the operational inventory of every system that sends data into the affiliate layer, receives data from it, or influences how commissions are calculated. Without this map, the migration plan is incomplete no matter how good the new platform looks in demos.
Core Integration Categories
Track360 works in stack-dependent environments, so the right migration view is category-first rather than vendor-first. Start by identifying which category each dependency belongs to and what role it plays in attribution or payout logic.
Category
Examples
Why It Matters
Trading platform
MetaTrader, cTrader, DXtrade, Match-Trader
Supplies trading events, lot volume, and account activity
CRM / back office
Leverate, TradeCore, SkaleCRM, FXBO, Antelope
Holds client records, sales ownership, and operational workflows
iGaming backend
Phoenix365 and similar operator stacks
Supplies registrations, deposits, and gaming revenue events
Prop infrastructure
Axcera, Trade Tech Solutions, WooCommerce
Controls challenge purchases, resets, and checkout attribution
Website / CMS
WordPress, landing pages, forms
Controls referral entry points and content-driven traffic
Fraud layer
24Metrics or internal controls
Filters abusive traffic and affects qualification logic
Questions to Answer for Each Dependency
What event does this system send or receive?
Is the event used for attribution, qualification, reporting, or payout approval?
Is the data real-time, batch, or manually imported?
Who owns the integration today: marketing, product, ops, BI, or an external vendor?
What breaks commercially if this dependency fails for one day?
Do Not Trust the Official Diagram Alone
The architecture diagram is rarely enough. In many teams, the real business logic sits in CSV exports, payout review spreadsheets, ad hoc scripts, or manual approvals. You need to interview the people who actually operate the program: affiliate managers, finance, CRM owners, BI, and whoever handles exceptions when numbers do not match.
If your current system has partner-specific exceptions, capture them explicitly. These are often the first things lost in migration, and they create the fastest trust damage because top partners usually depend on them.
Output of This Step
At the end of this phase, you should have a single migration sheet listing all connected systems, all inbound and outbound events, owners, dependency level, and cutover risk. This becomes the control document for implementation and QA.
System name and category
Event types and direction of sync
Current owner and technical contact
Business impact if unavailable
Migration method: preserve, rebuild, simplify, or retire
Key Takeaways
Migration planning starts with a dependency map, not with page content or UI screens.
Use integration categories to identify where attribution and payout logic really depends on the stack.
Interview operators, finance, and BI to uncover logic that is not documented anywhere else.
Produce one control sheet listing systems, events, owners, and commercial cutover risk.