Commission models are not interchangeable. Each model performs differently depending on where players cluster in the lifecycle. A CPAdeal works when operators need volume and can absorb early losses. A RevShare deal works when affiliates deliver players who stay. Hybrid deals split the difference. The challenge is matching the model to the reality of your player mix -- not just the theory.
CPA: Pay for the Moment
Cost per acquisition pays a fixed fee when a player completes a qualifying action -- usually a first deposit meeting a minimum threshold. Common CPA rates in iGaming range from $100 to $400 per FTD for casino, $50 to $150 for sportsbook, and $150 to $500 for high-roller or VIP-targeted traffic. The rate reflects the operator's expected LTV minus a margin for profit and risk.
CPA puts all lifecycle risk on the operator. If a player deposits $25, claims the welcome bonus, and never returns, the operator has paid the affiliate $200 for a player worth negative revenue. This is why CPA deals include qualification rules: minimum deposit amounts ($20-$50), wagering requirements before the affiliate is credited, or deposit-plus-play combinations.
Commission Model
Lifecycle Alignment
Operator Risk
Affiliate Risk
Typical iGaming Range
Flat CPA
Pays at FTD only
High -- pays regardless of player retention
Low -- guaranteed payment per conversion
$100-$400 per FTD (casino)
Tiered CPA
Pays more for higher deposit amounts
Medium -- scales with player commitment
Low -- predictable per tier
$80-$600 depending on deposit tier
RevShare (NGR)
Pays ongoing as player generates revenue
Low -- only pays when player is profitable
High -- zero income if player churns early
25-45% of NGR
RevShare (GGR)
Less common, pays on gross revenue
Medium -- pays before operator costs
Medium -- more predictable than NGR
15-30% of GGR
Hybrid (CPA + RevShare)
Pays upfront plus ongoing
Medium -- partial upfront commitment
Medium -- base plus upside
$50-$150 CPA + 15-25% NGR RevShare
RevShare: The Lifecycle Bet
Revenue share aligns affiliate income with long-term player value. An affiliate earning 35% NGR RevShare on a player generating $200 NGR per month earns $70 monthly -- indefinitely. Over 12 months, that is $840 from a single player. Compare that to a $250 CPA paid once. The math favors RevShare when players retain, and it punishes affiliates when players churn.
The critical variable is negative carryover. When a player has a winning month (positive for the player, negative NGR for the operator), that loss carries forward to subsequent months. The affiliate earns nothing until the cumulative balance turns positive again. In casino, large jackpot wins can create months of negative carryover. In sportsbook, a single successful accumulator bet can wipe out months of affiliate earnings.
Negative carryover is the single largest risk in RevShare deals. One high-roller winning $50,000 on a progressive jackpot can create six or more months of zero affiliate income. Affiliates should negotiate carryover caps or monthly reset terms when dealing with high-variance traffic.
Hybrid: Splitting Lifecycle Risk
Hybrid deals combine a reduced CPA with a lower RevShare percentage. The CPA component covers affiliate acquisition costs immediately, while the RevShare provides upside if players retain. A typical hybrid might be $100 CPA plus 20% NGR RevShare -- less than a full CPA ($250) and less than full RevShare (35%), but the combination reduces volatility for both sides.
Hybrid deals are particularly effective in the early stages of an affiliate relationship. The operator reduces upfront exposure while the affiliate relationship proves itself. After 3-6 months of data, both parties can renegotiate toward pure RevShare (if player quality is strong) or higher CPA (if retention is low).
Matching Models to Traffic Sources
SEO-driven affiliates (review sites, comparison pages): Prefer RevShare -- their traffic has higher intent and longer retention
Paid media affiliates (PPC, social ads): Prefer CPA -- they need immediate ROI to cover ad spend
Content creators (streamers, YouTubers): Prefer hybrid -- audience trust drives retention, but content costs are upfront
Email marketers: Prefer CPA -- high volume, variable quality, fast conversion cycles
Sub-affiliate networks: Require CPA or tiered CPA -- network layers compress margins too much for RevShare
Track the 30-day second deposit rate for each affiliate. Affiliates whose players exceed 40% second deposit rate are strong RevShare candidates. Below 25%, CPA is safer for both parties.
Key Takeaways
CPA pays at FTD and puts lifecycle risk on the operator -- rates typically $100-$400 for casino, $50-$150 for sportsbook
RevShare aligns affiliate income with player retention but exposes affiliates to negative carryover risk
Hybrid deals reduce volatility by combining reduced CPA with lower RevShare, effective for new affiliate relationships
Traffic source type strongly predicts which commission model works: SEO affiliates suit RevShare, paid media suits CPA
Second deposit rate is the strongest early signal for matching affiliates to the right commission model