Revenue Share
A commission model where affiliates receive a recurring percentage of the net revenue generated by referred users for the lifetime of those users or for a defined period.
What it means in practice
Revenue share, often shortened to RevShare, ties affiliate payouts to ongoing user economics rather than a one-time event. Instead of a flat CPA at first deposit or first trade, the affiliate earns a percentage of what each referred user produces in revenue over time. The calculation basis matters: iGaming programs typically pay on NGR (net gaming revenue after bonuses, taxes, and chargebacks) rather than GGR, and the difference between the two is significant enough that the choice belongs in the affiliate agreement before any traffic flows. The model rewards quality acquisition because low-value players generate low commissions.
Operationally, revenue share shifts both upside and risk onto the affiliate. The operator pays only when revenue exists, which protects margin during onboarding heavy months. The affiliate carries the early-stage risk that referred users churn before generating enough revenue to cover acquisition cost, but benefits from compounding earnings on long-lifetime users. Most programs apply revenue share deductions including chargebacks, refunds, and bonus costs, and many enforce a revenue share floor of zero so that loss months for a cohort are not passed on to the affiliate. Tier structures often open higher percentages as monthly NGR thresholds are reached.
The main pitfalls in revenue share programs are unclear deduction rules, negative carryover policies that surprise affiliates, and short cohort lifetimes that make the model unattractive compared to CPA. Operators sometimes also struggle with the operational overhead of monthly reconciliation across many affiliates and many user cohorts. Comparing the model against alternatives such as hybrid commission helps both sides decide what fits the vertical: high-LTV iGaming favors RevShare, while short-LTV forex affiliates often prefer CPA or hybrid structures.
How Revenue Share works across industries
See how revenue share is applied in the verticals Track360 supports, from qualification logic and payout structure to the operational context behind each model.
How Track360 handles this
Track360 supports revenue share with deduction handling, monthly cohort reconciliation, tier escalators, and negative-carryover controls, so commission management runs without manual spreadsheet work across iGaming, Forex, and Prop Trading programs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about revenue share, how it works in affiliate programs, and where it shows up across Track360's supported verticals.
Most iGaming programs pay on NGR (net gaming revenue), which is GGR minus bonuses, chargebacks, gaming tax, and sometimes processing fees. Some programs pay on GGR but apply a lower percentage to compensate. The choice should be documented in the affiliate agreement, with a worked example showing exactly which deductions apply. Without that documentation, monthly disputes are common.
Related Terms
RevShare (Revenue Share)
RevShare is a commission model where an affiliate earns an ongoing percentage of the revenue generated by their referred customers, typically calculated on a monthly basis.
CPA (Cost Per Acquisition)
CPA is a commission model where an affiliate earns a fixed payment for each qualifying action, such as a deposit, registration, or purchase, that a referred user completes.
Hybrid Commission
Hybrid commission combines two payout models, most commonly CPA and RevShare, in a single affiliate deal so operators can reward both conversion volume and long-term customer value.
GGR vs NGR
GGR is wagers minus winnings. NGR deducts bonuses, taxes, and fees from GGR. The difference impacts affiliate RevShare payouts by 30-50%.
Revenue Share Deductions
Revenue share deductions are costs subtracted from gross revenue before calculating an affiliate's RevShare payout, including bonuses, taxes, fees, and chargebacks.
Negative Carryover
Negative carryover is a policy where a negative revenue balance from one period is rolled into the next period and offsets future affiliate earnings before new commissions are paid out.
CPA vs RevShare
CPA pays a fixed amount per conversion. RevShare pays an ongoing percentage of revenue. The core difference is where risk sits after the acquisition happens, and which model aligns with your program goals.
Continue Learning
Free structured courses that cover this topic and more.
Casino Affiliate Program Management
How to build and manage casino affiliate programs. Covers RevShare, NGR, player attribution, fraud prevention, and multi-brand operations.
iGaming Affiliate Revenue Models
GGR vs NGR, RevShare deal structures, player lifetime value alignment, negative carryover, and deal optimization for casino and sportsbook affiliate programs.
Related Articles
Further reading on revenue share and related affiliate program topics.
iGaming M&A Deals Tracker 2026: Confirmed Deals 2024-2026
This tracker records 24 confirmed iGaming M&A transactions announced or completed between January 2024 and July 2026, covering operator consolidation, supplier and platform deals, affiliate media groups, and payments and compliance technology. Every deal lists acquirer, target, announcement and completion dates, disclosed value or 'undisclosed', and strategic rationale. Rumoured and pending transactions are recorded separately and never mixed into the confirmed table. Reviewed quarterly.
Jul 18, 2026
Affiliate Payment Terms Benchmarks 2026 (All Verticals)
Affiliate payment terms in 2026: monthly NET15 is the single most common frequency, minimum payout thresholds cluster at $100 for iGaming and $250 for forex, bank transfer and Skrill still dominate iGaming payouts while crypto has become the default for prop firms, hold-backs run 5-15% of the payable balance, and clawback windows sit at 30-90 days. This benchmark sets out ranges and medians for frequency, thresholds, payment-method mix, hold-back and negative-carryover practice, and dispute windows across five verticals, with the method behind every number stated.
Jul 18, 2026
iGaming Platform Pricing 2026: Revenue Share vs Fixed Fee
iGaming platform pricing runs on reported revenue-share bands of roughly 10 to 30 percent of GGR for white label and 5 to 15 percent for turnkey, against fixed monthly licences reported at EUR 5,000 to EUR 25,000 plus setup. No vendor publishes a rate card, so this guide works from reported bands and Track360 modelling: the four commercial models, minimum guarantees, a worked three-scenario total-cost table, hidden costs, and the negotiation levers that move the number. Reviewed quarterly.
Jul 18, 2026
Casino Platform Contracts 2026: Terms to Negotiate
Eight clauses in a casino platform contract decide what it costs to leave: term and auto-renewal, revenue-share ratchets, data ownership and export rights, exit assistance, SLA and uptime credits, IP and customisation rights, jurisdiction and certification responsibility, and exclusivity. This guide gives a clause-by-clause table with why each matters and what good looks like, plus the provisions that silently govern the affiliate programme. Commercial guidance, not legal advice. Reviewed quarterly.
Jul 18, 2026
Bundled vs Dedicated Affiliate Platform for iGaming (2026)
Platform-bundled affiliate modules such as Affilka by SOFTSWISS and PartnerMatrix by EveryMatrix are the right answer for most single-brand operators running one casino on one platform. Dedicated affiliate platforms earn their cost at 2 or more brands, 2 or more back ends, non-standard commission logic, or when data portability matters. This guide sets out an honest 10-criterion scoring framework, the specific limits bundled modules hit, and the migration cost on both sides.
Jul 18, 2026
Multi-Brand Affiliate Management for iGaming Operators (2026)
Running one affiliate programme across several brands, several platform back ends, and several jurisdictions creates five specific operational problems: account architecture, cross-brand deduplication, consolidated NGR and payout, brand-level commission variance, and compliance segregation. This guide compares four architecture options, sets out the reporting hierarchy that works at group scale, names the failure modes that appear at brand two and brand five, and explains when staying separate is the better answer.
Jul 18, 2026