Back to overview
Lesson 2 of 6

Auditing Commission Structures and Deal Logic

8 min read

Why Commission Logic Drifts Over Time

Commission structures are usually designed at program launch and then modified piecemeal as new partners negotiate custom terms. After 18 months, a typical program has a mix of CPA deals, RevShare arrangements, hybrid models, and one-off custom agreements that no single person fully understands. The original logic made sense. The accumulated modifications often do not.

A prop trading firm might have 150 affiliate deals. Twenty were set at $80 CPA per challenge purchase when the average challenge price was $200. The firm later introduced a $500 premium challenge, but those 20 deals still pay $80 flat -- meaning the firm pays the same acquisition cost for a $500 customer as for a $200 customer. This is margin leakage, and it hides in plain sight.

The Commission Audit Checklist

  • List all active deal types: CPA, RevShare, hybrid, tiered, and custom arrangements
  • Calculate effective commission rate per deal as a percentage of net revenue generated
  • Identify deals with no expiration date, no volume minimums, or no quality thresholds
  • Compare current CPA rates against actual customer lifetime value per affiliate
  • Flag RevShare deals where the partner cost exceeds 40% of net revenue over 6 months
  • Review multi-tier structures for downstream commission leakage at each level

Common Commission Problems by Vertical

VerticalCommon IssueDiagnostic Question
iGamingRevShare deals with no NGR floorAre any affiliates earning commissions on players with negative NGR?
iGamingCPA rates not adjusted for geoDo you pay the same CPA for a UK FTD and a Tier-3 market FTD?
ForexLot-based rebates on dormant accountsAre IBs earning rebates on accounts with no trading activity for 90+ days?
ForexMulti-tier IB structures paying 5+ levelsWhat percentage of total commission goes to the originating IB vs. downstream tiers?
Prop TradingFlat CPA across challenge tiersDoes CPA scale with challenge price, or is it static?
Prop TradingNo clawback on refunded challengesDo you recover commission when a challenge purchase is refunded?

Dead deals are the silent cost center. Any agreement that has generated zero conversions in 90 days but remains active is consuming administrative overhead and creating liability risk. Flag and review all zero-activity deals quarterly.

Margin Analysis Framework

The goal of a commission audit is not to cut costs blindly. It is to ensure that every dollar in commission spending generates proportional value. Calculate your commission-to-revenue ratio per affiliate, per deal type, and per vertical. A healthy iGaming program typically runs at 25-35% of NGR in total affiliate costs. A Forex IB program might target 15-25% of spread revenue. If your ratios exceed these ranges, the audit has found something worth investigating.

Document every finding with the specific deal ID, partner name, and estimated monthly impact. Vague findings like "some deals seem expensive" do not lead to action. Specific findings like "Deal #1247 pays $120 CPA for players with an average LTV of $85" drive immediate renegotiation.

Key Takeaways

  • Commission structures drift from their original design as custom deals accumulate over time
  • Calculate effective commission rate as a percentage of net revenue -- not just the nominal CPA or RevShare percentage
  • Each vertical has predictable commission problems: iGaming NGR floors, Forex lot-based dormancy, Prop Trading flat CPA across tiers
  • Flag all zero-activity deals quarterly and document findings with specific deal IDs and estimated financial impact